"The Da Vinci Code" - middle-class, soccer-mom review by Linda Vining
The Da Vinci Code
For reasons I can't quite describe, I felt the urge to send up a review of "The Da Vinci Code". Well, a commentary, I guess. God knows I am not an expert on cinema, and my tastes in film are not comprehensive. But if you are just a middle-aged someone or other like me, you might want to know if you're likely to enjoy this film.
Yes. You will. You won't be awestruck. You will be entertained, and your time and the cost of your ticket will be well spent. If you go to the movies only when you expect to be swept away, well, you might as well learn that walking in the surf is good, too.
I rarely miss a Ron Howard film, because I like his storytelling. Also, I secretly consider him a fellow-traveller -- he's just a year younger than I am and, judging from his films, he has a lot of the same sensibilities I have. "The Da Vinci Code" has all the elements that make a Ron Howard story enjoyable for me, although not in the same large measure as some of his other films.
I can't agree that the film starts out too slowly, as some have said. A film that pops right off with a mysterious ritual murder is usually enough of an attention-getter for me, though perhaps I'm too easy to impress. I had not read the book before seeing the film (yes, I live on another planet), and if you have not read it either, you might want to do so before seeing the film. It will give you an appreciation for the mighty and largely successful job screenwriter Akiva Goldsman has done in unsnarling the book's plot lines in order to weave a workable film. The author has handed these folks quite a tangle of divergent yarns. The result of carefully knitting them together is not elegant, but it is cohesive enough to be a solid couple hours of exciting entertainment. So many lines of exposition are necessary to carry forward with Dan Brown's complicated story that it simply isn't possible to do justice to the texture of each one of them in the space of this film. If you find yourself hungry for more development of a character, a motivation, or a line of action, do just relax and watch it whizz by, because there is another fragment speeding in right behind it. This is one of those films in which you may periodically think that you entered in the middle of the conversation. It's an imperfection, to be sure, but it's far from a fatal one, and if you allow yourself to fuss about it you will miss the fun of a murder mystery.
I'm always surprised that so little is said about the cinematography, the production design, or the score when people write about film. These folks are lucky if they get an adjective each, per review. Yet a film is something you see and hear, and the writing and the acting don't account for even half of that. In "The Da Vinci Code", cinematographer Salvatore Totino and production designer Allan Cameron pull more than their weight, giving the film a visual richness that sustains you and carries you through places where the plot lines puzzle or trail off. There's a great deal of potentially overpowering classic architecture and artwork in the film, and these two men have done a splendid job of creating effective cameo appearances for such masterworks, causing them to act as gracious hosts to the story told by the film.
Speaking of gracious hosts, Hans Zimmerman's score can be credited with spinning the other-worldly atmosphere that carries this tangled story to us. His use of voices is particularly powerful in creating and sustaining our emotional response and sense of forboding in stretches where the action is in transit from one incident to another. This is music that guides us through the dark.
I'm not sure where the notion comes from, but there seems to be a current theory that a film with 'high production values' is not entitled to show any rough edges. As a movie-goer, I care most about meshing the various components of a film so as to bring the story home in one piece. That's why I go to the movies. "The Da Vinci Code" accomplishes this, rough spots notwithstanding. Go see it.




